Loading...

Case Study: Closing The Safety Gap

manufacturing facility in operation

Case Study

Closing The Safety Gap: A Manufacturer’s Journey To A Safer, More Efficient Facility

By partnering with Justrite Safety Group, a major manufacturer in the Southeastern US was able to identify key safety gaps and implement proven solutions to reduce risk, improve compliance, and protect its workforce. They operate a large facility with multiple production lines and a substantial workforce. Like many industrial manufacturers, their operations involve heavy machinery, chemical storage, and frequent material handling-environments where safety risks are ever-present.

Hazard Analysis

Most hazards related to either physical safety (slips, trips, falls), hazardous material handling, or emergency response readiness. A recurring theme was the need for clearer visual cues-signage, matting, and floor marking-to guide safe behavior and restrict access where necessary. The specific hazards identified included:

Hazard

Environment

Key Indicators

Chemical and Flammable Material Storage Maintenance shop ! Lacking sufficient flammable storage cabinets
Safe charging and storage of lithium-ion batteries.
Emergency Preparedness Multiple areas ! Missing clearly marked and properly equipped emergency eye wash stations.
Slips, Trips, and Falls Wet or high traffic areas, especially around sinks, welding stations ! Absence of anti-slip or anti-fatigue matting.
Loading Dock Safety Loading dock ! Better protocols and signage for wheel chock use to prevent vehicle movement during loading and unloading
PPE Compliance Welding and maintenance areas ! Gaps in PPE signage and enforcement
Traffic and Access Control Operational areas ! Inadequate floor marking and signage contributing to potential congestion and unauthorized access

VIOLATIONS & RISKS

Identified potential OSHA violations with fines up to $15,625. Some of the top violations found were:

  • OSHA 29 CFR 1910.151(c)
  • OSHA 29 CFR 1910.178(g)
  • OSHA 29 CFR 1910.303(g)(1)
  • OSHA 29 CFR 1910.22(a)

Why It Matters

Addressing these hazards isn’t just about compliance, but protecting people and the business. The survey referenced several OSHA and NEC codes, particularly regarding emergency equipment, hazardous material storage, and access to electrical panels. Non-compliance with these regulations can result in significant financial consequences.

Recommendations

By proactively identifying and addressing these risks, facilities like this one can avoid costly incidents, improve employee morale, and maintain uninterrupted operations.

Share: